Completely contrasted to the serene, fertile bush shown previously, the city appears noisy and busy; a whole other world. Neville, who resides in Perth, is completely separated from the Aboriginals supposedly under his care. The sounds of Perth shown in the film, the blaring horns and busy traffic, imply to the viewer that Neville is isolated from the problems he causes, and unsympathetic to the suffering of the Aborigines.
Sitting at his desk, Neville is surrounded by his possessions: Filing cabinets, wooden furniture and paperwork.
The only colours are dull browns, grey, cream and white. By seeing Neville enclosed by all this order, regulation and procedure, the viewer sees him as a very isolated person, incapable of looking past the formalities and regulations of Aborigines and seeing them as real people who share the same feelings and emotions as white people. Moreover, in the scene Neville is giving a presentation and addressing the white women, he is flooded with blinding white light from the projector as he speaks about the half-caste children being a problem that must be fixed.
He is very harsh in appearance. The white light is contrasted to the dark shadows which the rest of the room is filled with. Through this lighting, Neville appears very unsympathetic toward the suffering of the Aborigines and cares only for the absorption of the half-castes into the white community.
These harsh, bigoted words, along with the stark contrast of light, show Neville to be a very narrow-minded and controlling person. As chief protector of Aboriginals, Neville had power over every aboriginal in the state of Western Australia. For this reason, Aborigines had to ask permission to marry, visit relatives, and even to buy new shoes. In one particular scene, Neville denies an Aboriginal woman, Mary Wilson, permission to visit her daughter who is living at the Moore river settlement.
Additionally, through editing of sound between two scenes, Neville appears to be very powerful and dominating over Aborigines. After Molly, Daisy and Gracie were cruelly torn away from their families, their mother and grandmother are lying on the desert ground, crying for their loss. His cruel and ruthless tactics of protecting Aborigines is clearly demonstrated and the viewer is positioned to dislike him for this.
At times in the film, Neville is caring and well meaning, although he is showing it in the wrong way. He does not understand the impact his actions are causing to the Aborigines. He is trying to help them.
Despite his bigoted attitudes toward Aborigines, Neville is removing aboriginal children for what he believes is their own good. In one of the final scenes of the movie, he is shown sitting at his desk, surrounded by his filing cabinets, work and order. He is very isolated from the world. The shot is shown tilting down at Neville, making him appear very small and lonely. Despite having brought it upon himself, the viewer feels some amount of pity toward him and his isolation since it was because of misunderstood and misguided opinions of Aboriginal welfare.
Noyce has created Neville as a very unsympathetic character through techniques. Neville is an unfair, cruel and dominating authoritarian. However, Noyce also shows Neville as well-meaning and misunderstood. At times, the director evoked sympathy toward Neville, despite his character being so unsympathetic. Accessed September 15, We will write a custom essay sample on Rabbit-Proof Fence specifically for you. Leave your email and we will send you an example after 24 hours If you contact us after hours, we'll get back to you in 24 hours or less.
The inclusion of a voice over also reflects the fact that story telling is traditionally an oral activity in Aboriginal culture. Factors such as gender, ethnic background and economic status cut across the various levels and forms of education. A cultural and ideological approach to a film text however exposes assumptions about the way we live our lives.
This film can therefore be read on one level as an exciting adventure story in which three innocent children make a daring escape from their captors. On a second level, a social and cultural study of the film will draw the viewer to consider what is meant by the Stolen Generation and consider the thinking behind official government policy of the period. They are both looking upwards watching the Spirit Bird which is out of shot. Early in the film the viewer is therefore positioned to see the spiritual nature of Aboriginal culture.
Phillip Noyce's 'Rabbit Proof Fence' expresses many of the values and attitudes regarding respect and dignity. This is clearly shown by the unjust policy enforced by the government during the 's with the mistreatment of the aboriginal people.
The film Rabbit Proof Fence is reminiscent of a war story as the country has been invaded and taken over. The invaders are taking away the children and placing them in camps. Only three manage to escape on their epic journey home they must cross through enemy occupied territory, never knowing friend from foe.
Rabbit Proof Fence Essay Words | 3 Pages individual (and combinations of several) techniques to reprensent the concept of the physical journey and specifically that it is the journey, not the destination that matters. Review of Rabbit Proof Fence by Phillip Noyce Introduction In the 'Rabbit Proof Fence', Phillip Noyce, the writer, takes into account the conflicting opinions over the 'stolen generation policy'. This was an Australian policy which involved taking half-caste aboriginals away from their families and homes, to be brought up in a white society.
The movie, Rabbit-Proof Fence (Noyce et al. ), is based upon the lives of three mixed-race Australian Indigenous girls who were taken from their. The book ‘Follow the Rabbit-Proof Fence’ that is written by Doris Pilkington is about three aboriginal half-cast girls that run away from The Moore River Native Settlement.